American Idol producer, Nigel Lythgoe, sounded off on American Idol executives, rival singing competitions, why females can’t win, White Guys with Guitars,  and more in a revealing interview conducted with TV Line after Wednesday’s season finale.

Nigel was a little peeved after FOX honcho, Kevin Reilly told reporters at the recent Upfronts in New York City that Idol should have been tweaked more Season 11 in anticipation of a ratings slide:

TVLINE | Fox entertainment president Kevin Reilly recently told reporters that Idol‘s Season 11 ratings dipped “more than anticipated” and that in retrospect the show should’ve made more creative tweaks to stay competitive in the crowded reality singing competition space. How did you feel about those remarks, especially considering that in many ways, Season 11 felt like a genuine creative success?
I’m shocked that he would say we didn’t anticipate that. We always stayed away from [airing] two seasons of American Idol [per calendar year], knowing that ratings would dip, and the public would get tired. It’s just the very nature of offering the audience too much [of a particular thing]. Now, if you’re going to do The X Factor on the same [network] as American Idol, that’s like two American Idols back-to-back. So, yes, I’m shocked that they thought that the ratings wouldn’t dip. Plus, The Voice is in the mix now, too. There’s just a lot more on offer today, and kids don’t always watch the television anymore. The world has changed in the 11 years that we’ve been doing this.

TVLINE | Nobody is drawing 25 million viewers per week.
They’re not. That’s a fact. So, when Kevin says we’ve got to do new things next year, what are the changes? The format is a very simple format. Kids audition for us. Their talent is what brings people in to watch the show. Do we change the format? Maybe we should do it under water while basket weaving? It surprises me that there’s some kind of challenge to the producers to make it more exciting. What do they think we do? Sit on our asses not worrying about the show? I know, let’s watch the ratings dip down, that will be fun, won’t it? I get very annoyed with people, especially executives that should know what they’re talking about, making statements like that, to be frank with you.

Nigel swears he does not care who wins year to year, however he WOULD like to take a look at the voting system next year:

TVLINE | Let’s talk about a phrase that comes up a lot with regard to Idol, a phrase that makes me sort of uncomfortable: White Guys With Guitars. There’s no denying the fact that white male contestants who play the guitar have dominated the show for several years running. So what I’m wondering is, do you stress about getting a more diverse roster of winners from the show?
The last few years, without question, it has been that way. I always get the comments — and we get it on [So You Think You Can] Dance, too –”Oh, the boys are always going to win, and the girls are going to be cut off one by one.” Season 11 of [Idol], that’s been the first year I [couldn't have told] you who’d definitely be in the finale. We never really had one person win two weeks running.

TVLINE | But is it a concern for Idol, as a franchise, to have a similar type of singer winning year after year, and to not have a female winner for five years running now?
There’s nothing you can do about it. When you say to America, you vote, the only thing that can be changed is the voting system. And I would hope that next year we would look at that.

Nigel does NOT stress about the kid’s post-idol careers, but he’s been disappointed when he felt the record label gave the kids the wrong songs–Ruben Studdard for instance:

TVLINE | Do you think and worry a lot about the contestants’ post-Idol careers? Because the one thing that really separates Idol from its competitors is that you really do launch a lot of folks who aren’t simply destined for the bargain bin a week after their albumns come out. That’s really a cornerstone, I think, for why people come back to the show every year.
Do I stress about it? No, I don’t stress about it because I’m already thinking about the next crop of kids, and they deserve our undivided attention. I do love the validation when they are successful. And I get annoyed when the record company, in my opinion, gives them the wrong music to sing. The best example I can give you of that is Ruben Studdard. I believe they just said, “Oh, you’re black, you should be singing urban music,” rather than [envisioning] this wonderful sort of crossover artist that he was. He was singing Neil Sedaka and the Bee Gees songs beautifully — in a sort of Donny Hathaway- Luther Vandross way. They just put him in this [narrow] category, which was a shame to me.

Other tidbits:

  • “The kids have got to choose their own songs, because everybody has an opinion. You can’t turn around and say, ‘Oh that’s not a good song.’ Not for you, it’s not.”
  • “The X Factor was magnificent in production. And certainly it got us to really look at our set and look at our production. What I always wanted to make sure of, though, was that we didn’t lose our contestants within the production.”
  • “We do focus on the talent. The camera shots can really help that. You know, you don’t want to just keep taking wide angles. I’m not particularly interested in the audience. I am happy that they are there, and they give a great atmosphere. But I don’t need to see them when the kid is singing.”
  • “The television producers, of which I include myself, don’t give a damn who wins this show. The only thing we’re interested in is turning out a fabulous show for people to watch. We get no money from the record companies or anything else. Thank goodness. Because, you know, there might be every reason to be swayed if that were true. We don’t care who wins. Even our favorites. Other than that,  we just want the best people to be there at the end.”

If Nigel doesn’t think there are changes to be made, will he make them anyway at the behest of FOX executives? Or will he push back? Frankly, I think the audition rounds–which haven’t been changed much since the show began in 2002–are a little tired and could use a tweak or two.

Does Nigel really not care who wins? From the perspective of an executive producing a television show, it probably does not matter much who wins, although successful winners reflect back well on the show and could goose the ratings.  It’s a tossup whether the lack of female winners since 2007 is helping or hurting the show. Personally, I think it’s the sudden influx of new shows like X Factor and The Voice that is responsible for this year’s steep downturn.  There are only so many hours in the week to watch singing competitions. There are viewers out there making decisions between the shows, I believe. Plus, Americans are watching less network television, generally.

Nigel admits that the big production values on X Factor led to Idol adding their own flash into the mix.  But please, Nigel. No more swinging chairs.  Don’t break your promise to never lose site of the kids.  Keeping the focus on the talent is what separates Idol from the imitators.

Tagged with:
 
  • http://www.facebook.com/CarolH222 Carol Howard

    There was one other thing I wanted to add to my previous comment. And maybe the most important. People watch this show and vote , I think more than any other reason because they care who wins. Or at least they used to care.
    MAKE WINNING SPECIAL!  When the producers or whoever decide to give more push and attention to someone other than the winner, they degrade the whole idea of the show. Promote whoever they want but don’t neglect the winner. Winning has to be special or I just don’t care to watch or vote.

  • Anonymous

    It should not be a surprise that WGWGs win because covers always sound better with a guitar. Just go to your local coffeeshop. Heck, I have a guy on my street playing covers and I am sure as hell that he’d win Idol. 

    Meanwhile, straight up singers, even if they change the key, slow down songs, sing upbeat will always be called karaoke.AI’s a joke. Will still watch but won’t get invested anymore.

  • Hazehel

    If so, it would mean he got the most votes two weeks running.  Nigel claims that didn’t happen.

    As I have already explained, he probably meant no one person won two weeks running PRIOR to the finale (he was explaining why he couldn’t predict the Top 2 finalists), so that would exclude the finale.

    I actually agree with much that he said, many fans like to imagine that he is some kind of master manipulator to explain away why their favorite didn’t win, but in truth, he is just out to make good TV that people would want to watch, and he has been very successful in that as far as Idol goes.  There hasn’t been another TV show that is as successful as American Idol.

  • Anonymous

    I always laugh at people who think the show would be better with more current music. What should the contestants be singing? “Sexy & I Know It”? What’s hitting the charts right now is house inspired bubblegum music that doesn’t give a singer much to work with (and it will only be worst next year because it looks like boy bands are coming back and their songs while fun and catchy are never that deep). Songs by Usher and Chris Brown work live because they’re great performers. A shy church raised kid that trys out for Idol just doesn’t have the moves, and otherwise those songs don’t give a singer much to work with. And if the current music you’re thinking about is more alternative, well, it’s not like Mumford & Sons has had a Top Ten hit.

    American Idol has done well because many generations can watch it. In many ways, they’ve kept alive some great music and I’m glad they do it!

  • http://twitter.com/KariannHart Kariann Hart

    I believe Adam will be too busy with his career, making records, and touring.  I would like him to mentor next year.  Melinda Doolittle has done a good job commenting on Idol.  Maybe she would be a good judge?  At least one judge needs to go next season. She’s a former finalist and would probably be more honest than JLo has been.

  • koshka

    A yeah.. I think you should turn the radio on. There is more out there than bubblegum pop and more of it hits the 20 top than you think.Even bubblegum pop sounds better than sung well than another theme week or Neil Diamond. Its also not just songs in the past year.. performing songs frequently from the past decade would be nice.

  • Anonymous

    I think judges critiques are difficult in a season like this one, when so many of the contestants were so talented.  If criticism had been more severe, anyone flawed at all would have taken a constant beating.  I think women are critiqued more than men, particularly older women:  I would like to see them spread the wealth.  Letting P2 off during his bad week was unconscionable.  I think the guy looked and felt terrible, but they could have noted that in saying it was not a good performance.

  • Anonymous

    Kelly Ripa should shut up; she can (aand should) praise Jessica without dissing the actual winner.  While she may be a fan, you can bet your bippee she did not spend the night power voting.

  • Anonymous

    There were very viable minority contestants this year; Joshua and Jessica  were both incredibly talented.  You can not affirmative action a talent show:  if you do, no one will watch (including me) and there will be on line brawls between races (there already are).

  • Anonymous

    The WGWG category is so broad now, that Bieber or Timberlake would be considered WGWGs.  Scotty wasn’t one, except that he was white.  It was almost an aberration that he was country.

    Oh dear, I seem to be late to the party and alone here. Oops.

  • Mateja Praznik

     Why would anyone in their right mind spend the night power voting?

  • Anonymous

    Is there any such thing as a tv show these days whose ratings are not dropping? Has there ever — ever — been an 11-year-old tv show whose ratings didn’t drop? ….

    Put those two things together and I’m not sure there’s a whole lot they *can* do. People crave something new (even if what’s old is great) and people are watching less and less tv these days. …. None of that is Nigel’s fault, I must say (even though I want to smack him a lot of the time. heh)

  • http://twitter.com/tinawinabina Tinawina

    the average idol viewer doesn’t even know what a “WGWG” is. So the
    average idol viewer doesn’t think they are anything like each other.

    Not true. WGWG trended wordwide when Phillip won. LOL. There have been a slew of articles written about it. And this is purely anecdotal, but my friends and family, who do not visit message boards, talk about it whenever Idol comes up. This is not a “bubble” thing.

    You can not affirmative action a talent show:  if you do, no one will watch (including me)

    The irony of that statement is that is *exactly* the perception of what we have now. In a field of qualified candidates, one particular type seems to be granted an advantage in terms of who lands the job. And of course, if a minority or woman was ever to win this show again, there will be cries of how Idol pushed this person to win in order to be “PC” and how unfair it was to the other “better” candidate… just like it was with Ruben and Fanny, just like the rumblings around Jessica when it looked like she might actually win. LOL. Oh well.

    Anyway, it remains to be seen if people stop watching over it or if they merely become more detached from the show and give up voting.

  • Anonymous

     ”The WGWG category is so broad now, that Bieber or Timberlake would be
    considered WGWGs.  Scotty wasn’t one, except that he was white.  It was
    almost an aberration that he was country.”

    LOL.

    WGWG definition: A white guy with a guitar.  So, a white guy who sings and plays the guitar is a WGWG. 

    Not sure why Scotty wasn’t a WGWG.  As you pointed out, he is white.  He is a guy.  And as far as I know, he knew how to play the guitar before auditioning for Idol and played it while in Idol.

    A woman, for example, is close, particularly if she is white and plays the guitar (like Skyler this season or Brooke White (S7?)).  But she will never be a WGWG (unless she pulls a Chaz Bono). 

    A black guy is close, particularly if he plays the guitar.  But, you guessed it, he is not white.

  • Anonymous

    It is unfortunate the dialog around winners has degenerated to the point that it has, but if the producers ever parsed contestants by race, the entire contest would become unpleasant:  I don’t really think they do that, nor do I think they should. The dialog around Jessica became unpleasant from a couple of sides, including one that said the result was discrimination against her and another that kvetched because the Phillipines voted.  I don’t seriously think it was discrimination and I do not care about the votes from abroad.

    This is a no win situation.  The producers will get creamed if they attempt to change the result; better to let the American public vote in a very flawed system.  This ain’t a presidential run, it is a dumb contest.

  • http://www.facebook.com/virginia.banker.7 Virginia Banker

    One thing about American Idol is the young girls are voting. For the last 5 seasons I was able to name the winner. What they should do is let the singers should pick there own songs. The judges should not show favors to just one person.(should not stand up like they did.)If they are going to stand up for some one then they should do it for the ones that they say great things about. If you look back at some of the weeks you will see it. Now that would be one way that person might not get a lots of votes. And I hate screaming. They should have more Idols perform then any one else.

  • Karen C

    One thing about American Idol is the young girls are voting.

    I don’t think it’s just young girls voting, because the genres that the last 5 winners represent aren’t genres that are popular now among young girls.  I think there are a lot of adults that like rock or country voting now.

  • Anonymous

    Last year there was a lot of talk about the reason for WGWGs winning wasn’t so much the teens as it was their moms.  Apparently, the WGWGs are the type of kid moms would like as a son, or as a boyfriend for their daughters, or for themselves. 
    Not sure if I believe it, as it is hard to imagine a grown woman power-texting votes, or even dialing more than 10 times for someone.  But, if they join the tweens and become another group for WGWGs, even if they only vote a few times, there is really no hope for a girl to win.

  • Anonymous

    People make the show about the judges when they talk about how the judges don’t give good critiques.  I don’t actually have the sound turned on when they start talking or I fast forward past them when I can..

    I don’t actually belive any viewer is a slave to what the judges say.  No one lookes to the judges to guide their vote.  No real person does that!

  • Kurt Samuels

    Wrong!  Star struck teenagers do, and so do many others when the seed is planted in their mind that one or two contestants are overly praised and given standing ovations when they didn’t deserve them (Phillips for example).  And, by the same token, when Hollie (for example) was constantly ridden about being a bit pitchy week after week, yet Phillips who was NEVER in tune was never called out for it … only praised.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YRZ4ZGB4QBWUETLKEZH4TFHWXY Sigh…

    Or at least make sure they actually have talent, and some semblance of range. Nobody would say boo about WGWGs if their singing ability was actually up to snuff.  I know they have their fans, but critically they have been widely panned and commercially they flop. It might also help if the judges held them up to the same standards rather than giving them a pass on poor singing.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, they’ve all gotten the exact same scores for their singing on WNTS (they haven’t) and said scores have always been poor to middling (they haven’t).  And they’ve all received the exact same critical reviews of their albums (they haven’t), and the exact same sales records (they haven’t).

    They may share some portion of a single voting block but they are not all the same contestant or the same person in the media market.

  • Anonymous

    Melinda Doolittle has done a good job commenting on Idol.  Maybe she would be a good judge?  At least one judge needs to go next season. She’s a former finalist and would probably be more honest than JLo has been.

    Just don’t expect her to keep her butt in her seat when someone sings. :)

    Melinda Doolittle watches Joshua Ledet sing

  • Anonymous

    I’m sorry you feel that way.