I

f you’re a fan of Season 6 American Idol winner, Jordin Sparks, you might want to brace yourselves for the reviews of her new movie SparkLe which opened everywhere today. The reviews call the movie cliched and melodramatic. Although she gets some props for her vocal ability, Jordin’s acting is not highly praised. So far, the movie scores a 54% at Rottentomatoes.com Roger Ebert however, gave a fairly positive review.

A Woman Who Knows the Music Industry, and a Few Who Don’t (Yet) – Ms. Sparks is not much of an actress. Or at least her character, as conceived, is so innocent that she doesn’t seem fully aware of the melodramas swirling around her. But this 2007 winner of “American Idol,” who has slimmed down since her victory, has a wonderful voice. And in Sparkle’s big final number at a preposterous solo concert debut with a full gospel choir, to a packed house after minimal preparation, she delivers. That event is about as believable as the hoary myth of instant movie stardom after being discovered sipping a soda at Schwab’s drugstore. – The New York Times

Sparkle Lacks Shine: The PEOPLE Review – While the film’s melodrama is laughable (after Sister’s comedian beau, played by Mike Epps, flops at a club, the two run – in slow-motion – to the car), the real problem is that it’s unclear who the main character is supposed to be.Though the title suggests Sparkle is the star, the plot mostly revolves around Sister, at least until the end, when the movie is wrapped up in a sappy bow. Sister is more of a performer than Sparkle – meaning she suggestively grips a microphone like nobody’s business – but the stunning Ejogo, who delivers a chilling performance and gives her catchy solos her all, just doesn’t have the vocal chops that Sparks does.. – Read more at People

Sparkle – Director Salim Akil hits every cliché in the script and adds visual triteness of his own. Sparks, the Season Six American Idol winner, has a lovely smile and no discernible range as an actress. So her final transformation falls flat. Still, there’s one scene that almost redeems this mess of a movie. It’s Houston in church singing “His Eye Is On the Sparrow.” She gives it everything she has. And what a glory abides in her voice. In a movie that feels fake to its core, Houston is the genuine article. She will be much missed. – Read more at Rolling Stone

Sparkle – The three sisters are each cut from a very different cloth. The quietly ambitious Sparkle, a brilliant songwriter, is played by the sixth-season American Idol winner Jordin Sparks, who proves to be a lot like Irene Cara — that is, she’s pretty in a slightly pained way and wholesomely sincere to the point of being a bit boring. The whippersnapper Dolores (Tika Sumpter) mostly stays in the background, except when she explodes in moments of vengeful high dudgeon. And then there’s the sister known, literally, as Sister, who’s the star of the group and is played by the ravishingly sexy and accomplished British actress Carmen Ejogo. In this role, she looks and acts strikingly like a demon-driven, down-and-dirty Beyoncé, and her scenes with Mike Epps, as her charismatic but hateful comedian lover, are the most potent in the film. The truth is that whenever Sister is on screen, we’re a little unsure why the movie is named after anyone else. – Read more at EW

Sparkle – The basic purpose of the film is to fit the story into wall-to-wall music, and it does that with style and energy. “Sister and Her Sisters,” the original trio, come across as a gifted American Idol version of Diana Ross and the Supremes, which I think is the idea. And Sparkle as a solo act (with backup singers, a gospel choir and a full pit orchestra) brings down the house. “Sparkle” isn’t blindingly original but it delivers solid entertainment, and despite the clichés I was never for a moment bored. – Read more at RogerEbert.com

“Sparkle” review: A thrilling musical, despite damp Sparks – “American Idol” winner Sparks is a beautiful young woman with a great singing voice, but she’s too much of a Disney Channel majorette for this movie. Sex and soul and societal upheaval are going on all around her, but she’s only willing to dig so deep. In their scenes together, you can almost feel Luke trying to be passionate enough for both of them. Sparks’ tenuousness as an actress suffers all the more next to the powerful ensemble surrounding her, from the magnetic Luke to the carnal Ejogo to the wickedly charismatic Epps. Sumpter, it should be noted, steals scene after scene with her raised-eyebrow, take-no-prisoners deadpan humor. – Read more at Reauters

Tagged with:
 
  • Anonymous

    There are a lot of good comments embedded in the reviews:  “solid entertainment,” [Sparks] “wonderful voice – she delivers,” “the one thing it isn’t, however, is dull,” “beautiful young woman with a great voice”, “bright and breezy musical.”  IMO, JS is the best female voice from Idol – and the most beautiful woman, too.  Only 22 – she’s got a lot to learn and lots of time to do it – looking forward to her career.

  • Anonymous

    I am not surprised about all the negative reviews for Sparkle and Jordin.  I was reading the reviews for Sparkle online last night and I noticed that many reviewers were not very impressed with Jordin’s acting or the movie.  I would guess that Sparkle might not do  that well in box office sales.

  • Anonymous

    Could this be similar to “DreamGirls” where Beyonce was top billed but Jennifer stole the show? In this case Jordin has star billing, but Carmen seems to be getting all the raves.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t think people should be surprised by the negative reviews. Whitney couldn’t act and Jordin comes across to stiff to make a good actress. Plus the plot of the movie is a retread and the music is nothing special.

  • Anonymous

    I never saw the original, but if it’s a low budget endeavor, they might make their money back. We’ll find out on Monday. I don’t ever reading about Jordin taking any sort of acting classes. Seems that would have helped here, since she was thrown into such a HUGE role for her first attempt at acting.

  • Anonymous

    Billboard has an OpEd:  “Why ‘Sparkle” Will Shine for Young Women” -
    According to the review, “it’s the storyline of ‘Sparkle’ that will touch young women
    today, just as the original film did in 1976. Whitney helps to give
    “Sparkle” new life by chanelling her personal strength to the
    audience. And it’s a feeling that will linger with viewers long
    after the lights go up.”

    And from what I’ve been reading, Jordin’s role in the film does not lend itself to fireworks.   Got the good girl part – not always the most exciting.  
     

  • Kitwana

    According to Box Offce Mojo, the production budget for Sparkle is only $14 million. Not sure if this includes marketing but even if you add $6 million in marketing, the movie would only have cost $20 million so it does not have to sell a lot to be profitable. http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=sparkle2012.htm

    I wish we had similar information about the production budgets of the CDs of Idol contestants. I am convinced that some Idol’s CDs cost more to produce (production and marketing) than others so it is absolutely ridiculous to compare the “success” of idol CDs based on units sold without regard to costs.

  • Carriefan1

    This movie looks fantastic. Jordin Sparks and Whitney Houston are stunning together. I can’t wait to see it this weekend!

  • Anonymous

    I’ve always liked Jordin Sparks and I think the movie will do well. Most people will see it because of Whitney Houston.

    Jordin Sparks, Jennifer Hudson, Katharine McPhee, Fantasia, and Carrie Underwood all outdoing the male Idols with TV/movie roles. Good for them!

  • tucker davis

    76% of the audience said they liked it according to Rotten Tomatoes.

  • http://twitter.com/eilonwya10 Eilonwy

    76% of the audience said they liked it according to Rotten Tomatoes.

    It’s a likable movie. I went to see it this afternoon, and I enjoyed it even as I was rolling my eyes at flaws in the plot and dialog (well, snarky hipster, I would). When Jordin Sparks is given anything to work with at all, I found her plenty convincing — but all the actors have to work around what I see as substantial weaknesses in the script.

    Nonetheless, I really did have a good time. The music is fun; Sparks is adorable (which was not my opinion during S6) and gets the major character development bits right. Whitney Houston is weirdly awesome. There’s just potential to tell a much better story, I think.

  • Anonymous

    The Washington Post gave it a fine review – “Sparkle trafficks in gorgeous Motown style – sonic and visual.”
    And re Jordin:  “Sparks does a terrific job with her big number, a barnburner called ‘One Wing’ on which she holds her own before three backup singers, an orchestra and an enormous gospel choir.”   That’s my girl.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/TBRH25QFXTK5JOPE4HX7FBI5PE J

    In general I think singers make good actors. Especially those that sing with a lot of emotion, because being able to tell a story with the emotion they portray while singing is a form of acting, so that gives them a bit of practice, even if they have no direct experience in acting. I can’t think of any major singers who were really really bad actors. They were all at least decent, even if it was their first time acting at all.

  • Anonymous

    I totally disagree, singers don’t usually make good actresses. Whitney Houston sucked as a actress, it was her singing that saved Bodyguard. Mariah Carey was godawful in her movie. Madonna’s movie have totally bombed. I won’t even say how bad Kelly’s movie was. Jordin is a sweet girl, but lacks personality, that showed when she was on stage singing and the reviews are reflecting the same thing about her debut on the big screen. 

  • Anonymous

    The reviews are mixed, some think that she’s good, while others don’t.  That’s usually the case with any move and performance.  So far there are more good reviews than bad ones, both from critics and the general public, and the studio believes that the movie will break even this weekend.  The film only cost $14 million to make, and even though it is in just 2,244 theaters, Sony believes that it will be easy to reach that figure in just three days.  

  • Anonymous

    I totally agree.  The reviews have been mixed for the movie and poor for Jordin.  I saw one ysterday from http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2012/08/sparkle-review-houston-loss-more-emotional-than-film/ that was horrendous. 

    Why don’t these amateur Idol actresses take the time to get trained in acting instead of thinking their mug is enough to ‘branch out’. To be a good actress is difficult and takes years of training and experience.  I don’t think Jordin did herself any favors in taking a role that was far beyond her capabilities.

  • Anonymous

    Jordin will just have to console herself with the knowledge that she’s already landed a co-starring role in at least one other film.  I think she’ll be alright.

  • Anonymous

    I hope she gets acting lessons before she gets panned again in the next movie.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/7LS7KC5AHEOV5R27XD7GCWBHFU J

    (different J posting)

    I still say Olestra is the best role any Idol has ever played. 

    http://vimeo.com/1309315
     

  • Anonymous

    Another review from The Washington Times – August 17:

    The film “celebrates the power of music in a way that movies rarely do – by letting songs play out at their full length.”

    And “Miss Sparks is a wonderful singer, and her performances are the highlights of the movie.”

    Think I’ll wait to see the movie before I say whether it’s good or not.

  • Anonymous

    Like to see a movie before panning it. 

    And Jordin got fine reviews in The Washington Post and The Washington Times.

    Just never know until you see it yourself.